Skip to main content

Table 3 Palaeostress results. The following information is given for each data site: label used in this work; complete name; UTM coordinates, X and Y; affected rocks (Lm: limestone, Mu: mudstone, St: sandstone, Co: conglomerate); age; azimuth of the horizontal σ3 axis; stress ratio Re used by Etchecopar et al. (1981), and R used by Bott (1959); chronological order of stress tensors (1, 2); mean angular misfit (°) between observed slip and the resolved shear stress from the computed stress solution; number of explained faults (n) in relation with the total number (N) of faults of the sample; analytical method used for stress inversion (ET: Etchecopar method, Li: Lisle et al. (2001) method). Site 4 after Arlegui et al. (2005)

From: Alluvial sedimentation and tectono-stratigraphic evolution in a narrow extensional zigzag basin margin (northern Teruel Basin, Spain)

Site

Location

Lithology

Age

Stress state

Angular misfit (°)

n/ N

Analysis

method

Name

Coord. X

Coord. Y

σ3 azimut

Re

R

1

Alcamines río

673,795

4,500,189

Mu + St

Vallesian

086

0.58

1.72

11/17

ET

2

Villalba Alta macroestación

673,265

4,498,417

Mu + Co

Late Ruscinian

087

0

→ ∞

 

20/36

LI

3

Villalba Alta granja

672,271

4,498,208

Lm

Late Ruscinian

125 (1)

089 (2)

0

0

→ ∞

→ ∞

10°

25/35

26/35

ET

ET

4

13 Villalba Alta 1

671,947

4,497,718

Lm

Villafranchian

004

   

24/24

LI